fasterthanlight�
05-16 09:49 PM
Yup.
wallpaper justin bieber one less lonely
spdy_mn
08-02 07:08 PM
I googled it
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
It is dated Feb 08, 2007
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
It is dated Feb 08, 2007
pappu
01-24 12:25 AM
lot of members these days ask about various companies. You may also want to directly ask the company too all such questions.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=43890&postcount=19
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=43890&postcount=19
2011 Fans of Justin Bieber are
desixp
05-21 11:03 AM
Hi,
I think that status means you are greened.
I think that status means you are greened.
more...
eager_immi
07-18 04:02 PM
please put ' before the url
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...d1f1d6a1RCRD
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...d1f1d6a1RCRD
ita
01-12 05:32 PM
Does the I9 form that we sign with our company have any impact on our 485 processing if we leave the company using AC21.
Thank you.
Thank you.
more...
bbenhill
05-07 06:14 PM
We did the exact same thing. We informed officer that my wife's Extension is pending, he said that's fine and gave her I-94 valid for 40 days (time remaining on her H4 visa).
After she get her I-94 for 40 days then if her new H4 application is approved then she will get the extension of her I-94.
give me green if this helps :-)
Thx
After she get her I-94 for 40 days then if her new H4 application is approved then she will get the extension of her I-94.
give me green if this helps :-)
Thx
2010 justin bieber liverpool my
raysaikat
04-11 02:55 PM
Hello,
My wife is currently on H4 status. (Just the I-94, her visa expired last year October). She started her MS in Fall 2009. She already competed 2 Semesters of MS on H4 visa. We applied for her Change of Status to F1 visa in March. According to the USCIS processing dates, she will get the COS approved approximately in June 1st week.
She will have to travel to India this summer. The question we have is,
is it advisable to wait till she gets her F1 COS Approved and then go to India for F1 Stamping ?
or abandon the F1 COS and go for F1 stamping directly in India ?
Please advice if there are any risks involved here.
It is the same either way. Once she goes out, she would need a visa stamp to get back in. And the consulate will do whatever they needs/wants to do for approving (or not approving) the visa petition regardless of whether or not she was in F1 status before leaving US.
My wife is currently on H4 status. (Just the I-94, her visa expired last year October). She started her MS in Fall 2009. She already competed 2 Semesters of MS on H4 visa. We applied for her Change of Status to F1 visa in March. According to the USCIS processing dates, she will get the COS approved approximately in June 1st week.
She will have to travel to India this summer. The question we have is,
is it advisable to wait till she gets her F1 COS Approved and then go to India for F1 Stamping ?
or abandon the F1 COS and go for F1 stamping directly in India ?
Please advice if there are any risks involved here.
It is the same either way. Once she goes out, she would need a visa stamp to get back in. And the consulate will do whatever they needs/wants to do for approving (or not approving) the visa petition regardless of whether or not she was in F1 status before leaving US.
more...
jasmin45
07-12 10:27 AM
This is a good one! please digg this one for archive.
hair C justin bieber liverpool
rajenk
02-10 02:09 PM
That could be things like
NOID - Notice of intend to Deny.
RFE - Request for evidence.
For I-140 USCIS does not update the online status properly. For both of my EB3 and EB2 I-140s still the case status says they received the application and processing!
Wait for the document that they sent.
NOID - Notice of intend to Deny.
RFE - Request for evidence.
For I-140 USCIS does not update the online status properly. For both of my EB3 and EB2 I-140s still the case status says they received the application and processing!
Wait for the document that they sent.
more...
hibworker
12-07 05:28 PM
You are not limited to change job within the same corporation. However you are limited to changing the job within same or similar occupation.
Old company can revoke I-140 since it is their application. They can not revoke I-485 since it is your application. You may get RFE to show that you are still employed in same/similar occupation but that's about it. You don't need to start all over or lose your place in the queue.
Old company can revoke I-140 since it is their application. They can not revoke I-485 since it is your application. You may get RFE to show that you are still employed in same/similar occupation but that's about it. You don't need to start all over or lose your place in the queue.
hot Recording artist Justin Bieber
EB2_Jun03_dude
11-28 04:32 PM
PD: EB2 India - Jun03
I140 approved: Nov 05
I-485 applied: Jun 05
FP1: Jul 05
FP2: May 07
AC21: Job changed twice (Jun 06 and Apr 07). Sent EVL to USCIS both times with 'same job description' but 'different job title'.
This morning I received USCIS email alert for both my wife and I.
My I-485 application got a RFE. "We mailed you a notice requesting additional evidence". Will have to wait for the formal letter for the details. :(
My wife's I-485 application however was transferred to Newark NJ for interview. "This case has been sent for a standard interview." :confused:
I have a ton of questions at this stage. here are few in you gurus can help me while I am waiting for the RFE letter.
1) Will the RFE letter be mailed to me or my attorney ? what has been ur experience? do you get it in one week ?
2) why USCIS has split the processing of my I-485 and my wife's I-485. Her I-485 is transfered to Newark, NJ while mine is pending at TSC (now waiting for RFE response).
3) How much time will I have to respond to the RFE? Based on the new guidelines (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_timrfe.html) , I expect that to be stated in the RFE letter.
thanks in advance.
I140 approved: Nov 05
I-485 applied: Jun 05
FP1: Jul 05
FP2: May 07
AC21: Job changed twice (Jun 06 and Apr 07). Sent EVL to USCIS both times with 'same job description' but 'different job title'.
This morning I received USCIS email alert for both my wife and I.
My I-485 application got a RFE. "We mailed you a notice requesting additional evidence". Will have to wait for the formal letter for the details. :(
My wife's I-485 application however was transferred to Newark NJ for interview. "This case has been sent for a standard interview." :confused:
I have a ton of questions at this stage. here are few in you gurus can help me while I am waiting for the RFE letter.
1) Will the RFE letter be mailed to me or my attorney ? what has been ur experience? do you get it in one week ?
2) why USCIS has split the processing of my I-485 and my wife's I-485. Her I-485 is transfered to Newark, NJ while mine is pending at TSC (now waiting for RFE response).
3) How much time will I have to respond to the RFE? Based on the new guidelines (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_timrfe.html) , I expect that to be stated in the RFE letter.
thanks in advance.
more...
house Lexie, four. Bieber fever:
p_kumar
12-07 03:42 PM
Does USCIS usually says this. i assume it should say "AP approved " or something similar. Have anyone seen this message on tracking your online case status.
Thanks for any info.
Regards,
MK
Hope i am wrong but that looks like a denial.
Thanks for any info.
Regards,
MK
Hope i am wrong but that looks like a denial.
tattoo Justin Bieber will play ten UK
Blog Feeds
06-02 11:00 AM
From Talking Points Memo: Remember how Tom Tancredo went on CNN last week and called Sonia Sotomayor a racist, accusing her falsely of being a member of a "Latino KKK"? Well, if racism so offends him, how does he explain this? On July 7, 2007, at approximately 7:15 p.m. at Jefferson and M Street, Northwest, in Washington, D.C., defendant was walking down the street making offensive remarks when he encountered the complainant, Ms. [REDACTED], who is African-American. The defendant uttered, "Nigger," as he delivered a karate chop to Ms. [REDACTED]'s head. That defendant is named Marcus Epstein--a former Tancredo speechwriter...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/tancredo-aide-pleads-guilty-in-bizarre-racist-attack.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/tancredo-aide-pleads-guilty-in-bizarre-racist-attack.html)
more...
pictures Bieber is due to perform at
chanduv23
03-19 04:31 PM
Will they send an RFE immediately even after the I-485 has been pending for more that 180 days?
depends on the officer. A lot of officers do not know the AC21 law. As soon as they see 140 being revoked, they blindly send denial notices for 485 and you have to correct this through MTR.
After a 140 revocation by ex employer, it takes a few weeks for USCIS to act.
depends on the officer. A lot of officers do not know the AC21 law. As soon as they see 140 being revoked, they blindly send denial notices for 485 and you have to correct this through MTR.
After a 140 revocation by ex employer, it takes a few weeks for USCIS to act.
dresses justin bieber liverpool
maverick_joe
11-13 04:17 PM
Approval receipt has been received but no EAD card yet even after 30 days.what can be done? I opened a SR but they say wait for response for another 45 days!! If I have to reapply should I pay the fees again? Please help!
more...
makeup screaming Justin Bieber
Blog Feeds
12-22 02:30 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
girlfriend Justin Bieber is currently
pappu
02-09 11:42 PM
Can the core group let us know what are they targeting right now? Are they targeting CIR next month? The lack of direction will really lead to less contribution. Without that,I will have a hard time convincing other friends about IV.
Have the core members given up and decreased their activity?
Core group is working hard and is commited despite lack of full support and nagative comments they get on this site or other sites. Work will go on no matter what.
Pls join your state chapter to know what we are doing and speak with us directly and get direction. You will also get updates.
In your CA state chapter there was a conference call tonight and I was invited. I joined in and only the organizer and myself were there. There was nobody else there. We both spoke for one hour and I gave update to that member because I felt that I should value a commited member who is willing to make an effort and will be willing to do the work even if it means doing it alone without help from fellow members. We request members to help themselves by helping us and we can all togeher achieve our aims.
Have the core members given up and decreased their activity?
Core group is working hard and is commited despite lack of full support and nagative comments they get on this site or other sites. Work will go on no matter what.
Pls join your state chapter to know what we are doing and speak with us directly and get direction. You will also get updates.
In your CA state chapter there was a conference call tonight and I was invited. I joined in and only the organizer and myself were there. There was nobody else there. We both spoke for one hour and I gave update to that member because I felt that I should value a commited member who is willing to make an effort and will be willing to do the work even if it means doing it alone without help from fellow members. We request members to help themselves by helping us and we can all togeher achieve our aims.
hairstyles Justin Bieber - Liverpool Echo
ashwin
02-24 09:52 AM
delete thread
insbaby
08-06 02:21 PM
Its illegal by law.
-------------
OK. Assume that you decided to take the "better offer" by throwing the previous "better offer" and they trasnfer your H1, before joining them you will surely get another "better offer" in few months, because you are always searching for that, what will you do?
"Career growth is important and you have to catch the opportunities on your way." - I guess you misunderstood this.
I will not encourage this practice at all.
-------------
OK. Assume that you decided to take the "better offer" by throwing the previous "better offer" and they trasnfer your H1, before joining them you will surely get another "better offer" in few months, because you are always searching for that, what will you do?
"Career growth is important and you have to catch the opportunities on your way." - I guess you misunderstood this.
I will not encourage this practice at all.
hmehta
05-23 10:35 PM
Because if the person applying via EB based Green Card is married and if has children that many number of visas are used up when his application is approved, so even the petition was done for just 1 person, possibly, 2-3 unnecessary visas are being used up.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario